Malta vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Malta
20,000 current US$
in 1996
Samoa
20,000 current US$
in 2001
Malta rank
127th
Samoa rank
127th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Malta
- Samoa
How they compare
Malta currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Samoa ahead.
Malta ranks 127th and Samoa ranks 127th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 203,333 current US$ | 183,333 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Malta |
| 1980s | -9,000 current US$ | 276,000 current US$ | 285,000 current US$ | Samoa |
| 1990s | 35,000 current US$ | 167,857 current US$ | 132,857 current US$ | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Malta or Samoa?
- Malta, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Samoa as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Malta and Samoa?
- 0 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Samoa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1996.
- How do Malta and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Malta ranks 127th and Samoa ranks 127th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.