Malta vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Malta
20,000 current US$
in 1996
Singapore
20,000 current US$
in 1987
Malta rank
127th
Singapore rank
127th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Malta
- Singapore
How they compare
Malta currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Singapore, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Singapore ahead.
Malta ranks 127th and Singapore ranks 127th of 163 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 203,333 current US$ | 208,889 current US$ | 5,556 current US$ | Singapore |
| 1980s | -2,500 current US$ | 67,500 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Malta or Singapore?
- Malta, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Singapore as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Malta and Singapore?
- 0 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1987.
- How do Malta and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Malta ranks 127th and Singapore ranks 127th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.