Mauritius vs Slovenia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Mauritius
10,000 current US$
in 2005
Slovenia
10,000 current US$
in 2002
Mauritius rank
142nd
Slovenia rank
142nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time
- Mauritius
- Slovenia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Slovenia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Slovenia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 142nd and Slovenia ranks 142nd of 163 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83,333 current US$ | 123,333 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 73,333 current US$ | 460,000 current US$ | 386,667 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Mauritius or Slovenia?
- Mauritius, at 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Slovenia as of 2005.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 0 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2002.
- How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Mauritius ranks 142nd and Slovenia ranks 142nd of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) with 335 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.