Afghanistan vs Cape Verde: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Afghanistan
12.94 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde
11.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2013
Afghanistan rank
57th
Cape Verde rank
59th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Cape Verde
01.0k2.0k3.0k197119972023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 12.94 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 57th and Cape Verde ranks 59th of 160 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1970s 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre 592.06 current US$ per square kilometre 590.87 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre 1,958 current US$ per square kilometre 1,956 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 22.71 current US$ per square kilometre 2,400 current US$ per square kilometre 2,378 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 130.82 current US$ per square kilometre 2,052 current US$ per square kilometre 1,921 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 142.56 current US$ per square kilometre 410.83 current US$ per square kilometre 268.27 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Afghanistan or Cape Verde?
Afghanistan, at 12.94 current US$ per square kilometre against 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Afghanistan and Cape Verde?
1.12 current US$ per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Cape Verde?
36 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2013.
How do Afghanistan and Cape Verde rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Afghanistan ranks 57th and Cape Verde ranks 59th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Cape Verde: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/cabo-verde/">Afghanistan vs Cape Verde: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.