Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Barbados
23.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
Sao Tome and Principe
20.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Barbados rank
43rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Barbados
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k197119882005

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Barbados ranks 43rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre 502.6 current US$ per square kilometre 316.56 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 828.49 current US$ per square kilometre 312.5 current US$ per square kilometre 515.99 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 1,033 current US$ per square kilometre 102.68 current US$ per square kilometre 930.54 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 197.67 current US$ per square kilometre 41.67 current US$ per square kilometre 156.01 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Barbados or Sao Tome and Principe?
Barbados, at 23.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2005.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
2.43 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2002.
How do Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Barbados ranks 43rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sao-tome-and-principe/">Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.