Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Belarus
4.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
77th
Zimbabwe rank
76th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
0255075100125197920012023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.31 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Belarus ranks 77th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.493 current US$ per square kilometre 43.74 current US$ per square kilometre 43.24 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 5 current US$ per square kilometre 4.79 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2121 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.55 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
0.31 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Belarus ranks 77th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.