Czechia vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Czechia
28.48 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.3916 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
39th
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Czechia
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 28.48 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3916 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 28.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 72.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 39th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 160 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 26.08 current US$ per square kilometre 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre 22.33 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 21.9 current US$ per square kilometre 12.4 current US$ per square kilometre 9.5 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Czechia or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
Czechia, at 28.48 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3916 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Czechia and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
28.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
9 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do Czechia and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Czechia ranks 39th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Czechia vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.