Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square

Early-demographic dividend
7.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong
57.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Early-demographic dividend rank
26th
Hong Kong rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Hong Kong
0200400600800197019962022

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.85 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 49.29 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 7.3 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Hong Kong ranks 29th of 44 groups.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1970s 9.2 current US$ per square kilometre 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 16.07 current US$ per square kilometre 104.33 current US$ per square kilometre 88.26 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 20.62 current US$ per square kilometre 215.21 current US$ per square kilometre 194.59 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Early-demographic dividend or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.85 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong?
49.29 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong?
19 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 1996.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Hong Kong ranks 29th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/">Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.