East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
-0.165 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Hungary
19.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
44th
Hungary rank
47th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Hungary
0255075100125197019962022

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 19.86 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.165 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 20.02 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 120.4 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 44th and Hungary ranks 47th of 44 groups.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 6.76 current US$ per square kilometre 50.94 current US$ per square kilometre 44.17 current US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 12.11 current US$ per square kilometre 15.82 current US$ per square kilometre 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Hungary?
Hungary, at 19.86 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.165 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hungary?
20.02 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hungary?
12 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hungary rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 44th and Hungary ranks 47th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/hungary/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.