Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Guinea
25.11 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
20.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Guinea rank
41st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02505007501.0k197119962022

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 25.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 160 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre 502.6 current US$ per square kilometre 497.38 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre 312.5 current US$ per square kilometre 311.31 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre 102.68 current US$ per square kilometre 101.34 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 12.76 current US$ per square kilometre 41.67 current US$ per square kilometre 28.91 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Guinea, at 25.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 20.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
4.28 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2002.
How do Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Guinea ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.