Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
22.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Israel
305.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
10th
Israel rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Israel
0200400600800197019962022

How they compare

Israel currently reports 305.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 283.13 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 13.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Israel ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th and Israel ranks 11th of 44 groups.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Israel Difference Ahead
1970s 5 current US$ per square kilometre 10.63 current US$ per square kilometre 5.63 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1980s 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre 117.84 current US$ per square kilometre 98.04 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1990s 31.47 current US$ per square kilometre 401.9 current US$ per square kilometre 370.43 current US$ per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Israel?
Israel, at 305.92 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Israel?
283.13 current US$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Israel?
26 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1996.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Israel rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th and Israel ranks 11th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/israel/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.