Hong Kong, China vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Hong Kong, China
57.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
IBRD only
3.88 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
29th
IBRD only rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • IBRD only
0200400600800197019962022

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 53.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 14.7 times IBRD only's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 29th and IBRD only ranks 29th of 160 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China IBRD only Difference Ahead
1970s 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre 5.04 current US$ per square kilometre 11.53 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 104.33 current US$ per square kilometre 7.75 current US$ per square kilometre 96.58 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 215.21 current US$ per square kilometre 8.6 current US$ per square kilometre 206.61 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Hong Kong, China or IBRD only?
Hong Kong, China, at 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.88 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Hong Kong, China and IBRD only?
53.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and IBRD only?
19 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and IBRD only rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 29th and IBRD only ranks 29th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/ibrd-only/">Hong Kong, China vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.