Hong Kong vs Pacific island small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square

Hong Kong
57.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Pacific island small states
1.87 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
Hong Kong rank
29th
Pacific island small states rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors … Netherlands square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Pacific island small states
0200400600800197119932016

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Pacific island small states, a difference of 55.27 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 30.6 times Pacific island small states's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 29th and Pacific island small states ranks 32nd of 160 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Pacific island small states Difference Ahead
1970s 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre 7.66 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 104.33 current US$ per square kilometre 15.98 current US$ per square kilometre 88.35 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 215.21 current US$ per square kilometre 10.63 current US$ per square kilometre 204.59 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Hong Kong or Pacific island small states?
Hong Kong, at 57.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre in Pacific island small states as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Hong Kong and Pacific island small states?
55.27 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Pacific island small states?
19 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong and Pacific island small states rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Hong Kong ranks 29th and Pacific island small states ranks 32nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Pacific island small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/pacific-island-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/pacific-island-small-states/">Hong Kong vs Pacific island small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.