IDA total vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

IDA total
22.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Uganda
220.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA total rank
11th
Uganda rank
12th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • IDA total
  • Uganda
0100200300400197019962023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 220.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.27 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 198.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 9.9 times IDA total's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

IDA total ranks 11th and Uganda ranks 12th of 44 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IDA total averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 6.95 current US$ per square kilometre 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre IDA total
1980s 24.83 current US$ per square kilometre 30.68 current US$ per square kilometre 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 33.1 current US$ per square kilometre 125.06 current US$ per square kilometre 91.96 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 57.41 current US$ per square kilometre 308.86 current US$ per square kilometre 251.45 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 33.28 current US$ per square kilometre 124.43 current US$ per square kilometre 91.15 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 23.94 current US$ per square kilometre 195.35 current US$ per square kilometre 171.4 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), IDA total or Uganda?
Uganda, at 220.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.27 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between IDA total and Uganda?
198.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Uganda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA total and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
IDA total ranks 11th and Uganda ranks 12th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/uganda/">IDA total vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.