Low income vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Low income
23.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
220.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
9th
Uganda rank
12th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Low income
  • Uganda
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 220.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 196.6 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 9.2 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Low income ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 12th of 44 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 16.54 current US$ per square kilometre 30.68 current US$ per square kilometre 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 25.55 current US$ per square kilometre 125.06 current US$ per square kilometre 99.51 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 52.13 current US$ per square kilometre 308.86 current US$ per square kilometre 256.72 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 36.16 current US$ per square kilometre 124.43 current US$ per square kilometre 88.27 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 26.55 current US$ per square kilometre 201.64 current US$ per square kilometre 175.09 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Low income or Uganda?
Uganda, at 220.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Low income and Uganda?
196.6 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Low income and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Low income ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 12th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/uganda/">Low income vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.