Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Mauritius
4.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
Zimbabwe
4.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
75th
Zimbabwe rank
76th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
0255075100125197119972023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.07 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 78.82 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6462 current US$ per square kilometre 78.17 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 39.96 current US$ per square kilometre 49.23 current US$ per square kilometre 9.27 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 32.02 current US$ per square kilometre 70.12 current US$ per square kilometre 38.1 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 20.53 current US$ per square kilometre 38.69 current US$ per square kilometre 18.17 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Mauritius, at 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2005.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0.07 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2005.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Mauritius ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.