Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)

Sri Lanka
5.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
73rd
Zimbabwe rank
76th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.71 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 337.9 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6462 current US$ per square kilometre 337.26 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 384.88 current US$ per square kilometre 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre 338.43 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 206.39 current US$ per square kilometre 70.84 current US$ per square kilometre 135.55 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 294.74 current US$ per square kilometre 40.42 current US$ per square kilometre 254.31 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 10.9 current US$ per square kilometre 14.69 current US$ per square kilometre 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre 4.79 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9906 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$), Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
Sri Lanka, at 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
0.71 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
Sri Lanka ranks 73rd and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/">Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 8,112 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.