Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 127th of 163 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 102,500 current US$ | 300,000 current US$ | 197,500 current US$ | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 1990s | 26,667 current US$ | 93,333 current US$ | 66,667 current US$ | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 30,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2002.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 127th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.