Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands

Equatorial Guinea
20,000 current US$
in 2002
Singapore
20,000 current US$
in 1987
Equatorial Guinea rank
128th
Singapore rank
128th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Singapore
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197119862002

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Singapore, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Singapore ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 128th and Singapore ranks 128th of 164 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 30,000 current US$ 120,000 current US$ 90,000 current US$ Singapore
1980s 123,750 current US$ 67,500 current US$ 56,250 current US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands, Equatorial Guinea or Singapore?
Equatorial Guinea, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Singapore as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands between Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
0 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
9 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 1987.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 128th and Singapore ranks 128th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us/equatorial-guinea/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-netherlands-current-us/equatorial-guinea/singapore/">Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 8,276 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.