Papua New Guinea vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Samoa
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Samoa ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 127th and Samoa ranks 127th of 163 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 192,000 current US$ | 252,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | Samoa |
| 1980s | 329,000 current US$ | 276,000 current US$ | 53,000 current US$ | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 1.05 million current US$ | 158,750 current US$ | 891,250 current US$ | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.19 million current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 1.17 million current US$ | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands, Papua New Guinea or Samoa?
- Papua New Guinea, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Samoa as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands between Papua New Guinea and Samoa?
- 0 current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Samoa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2001.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 127th and Samoa ranks 127th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.