Least developed countries vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Least developed countries
-34.76 % change on previous year
in 2022
Pakistan
30.56 % change on previous year
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
28th
Pakistan rank
30th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Pakistan
0200400600800197319982023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 30.56 % change on previous year against -34.76 % change on previous year in Least developed countries, a difference of 65.32 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 28th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s -5.08 % change on previous year -52.45 % change on previous year 47.37 % change on previous year Least developed countries
1980s 20 % change on previous year 30.83 % change on previous year 10.83 % change on previous year Pakistan
1990s 13.62 % change on previous year 56.02 % change on previous year 42.4 % change on previous year Pakistan
2000s 15.86 % change on previous year 91.9 % change on previous year 76.04 % change on previous year Pakistan
2010s 10.62 % change on previous year 107.5 % change on previous year 96.88 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Least developed countries or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 30.56 % change on previous year against -34.76 % change on previous year in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Least developed countries and Pakistan?
65.32 % change on previous year, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Pakistan?
38 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2011.
How do Least developed countries and Pakistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Least developed countries ranks 28th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-un-classification/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-un-classification/pakistan/">Least developed countries vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
148 places, 4,751 data points, 1971–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.