Barbados vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Barbados
10,000 current US$
in 2010
Gambia
10,000 current US$
in 2017
Barbados rank
93rd
Gambia rank
93rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Barbados
- Gambia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 93rd and Gambia ranks 93rd of 114 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,250 current US$ | 42,500 current US$ | 21,250 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 20,000 current US$ | 34,500 current US$ | 14,500 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2010s | 10,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Barbados or Gambia?
- Barbados, at 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Gambia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Barbados and Gambia?
- 0 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Gambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2010.
- How do Barbados and Gambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Barbados ranks 93rd and Gambia ranks 93rd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.