Barbados vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Barbados
10,000 current US$
in 2010
Singapore
10,000 current US$
in 1993
Barbados rank
93rd
Singapore rank
93rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Barbados
- Singapore
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Singapore, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 93rd and Singapore ranks 93rd of 114 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 22,500 current US$ | 172,500 current US$ | 150,000 current US$ | Singapore |
| 1980s | 10,000 current US$ | 112,500 current US$ | 102,500 current US$ | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Barbados or Singapore?
- Barbados, at 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Singapore as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Barbados and Singapore?
- 0 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Singapore?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1983.
- How do Barbados and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Barbados ranks 93rd and Singapore ranks 93rd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.