Belize vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Belize
29,644 current US$
in 2019
Uzbekistan
30,000 current US$
in 2006
Belize rank
74th
Uzbekistan rank
72nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Belize
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 29,644 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 356 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Belize ranks 74th and Uzbekistan ranks 72nd of 114 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,250 current US$ | 26,250 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 14,286 current US$ | 61,429 current US$ | 47,143 current US$ | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Belize or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 30,000 current US$ against 29,644 current US$ in Belize as of 2006.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Belize and Uzbekistan?
- 356 current US$, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Uzbekistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2006.
- How do Belize and Uzbekistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Belize ranks 74th and Uzbekistan ranks 72nd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.