Bhutan vs Euro area: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Bhutan
- Euro area
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 198,795 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 188,795 current US$.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 19.9 times Euro area's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 47th and Euro area ranks 44th of 114 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Euro area | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 64,286 current US$ | 25,714 current US$ | 38,571 current US$ | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 103,750 current US$ | 33,750 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 247,500 current US$ | 18,750 current US$ | 228,750 current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Bhutan or Euro area?
- Bhutan, at 198,795 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Bhutan and Euro area?
- 188,795 current US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Euro area?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2003.
- How do Bhutan and Euro area rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Bhutan ranks 47th and Euro area ranks 44th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.