El Salvador vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- El Salvador
- Malta
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 23,811 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Malta, a difference of 3,811 current US$.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1995 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 82nd and Malta ranks 84th of 114 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86,000 current US$ | 29,000 current US$ | 57,000 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 40,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), El Salvador or Malta?
- El Salvador, at 23,811 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Malta as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between El Salvador and Malta?
- 3,811 current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malta?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2001.
- How do El Salvador and Malta rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- El Salvador ranks 82nd and Malta ranks 84th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.