Eritrea vs Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Eritrea
30,000 current US$
in 2005
Guatemala
28,619 current US$
in 2022
Eritrea rank
72nd
Guatemala rank
75th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Eritrea
- Guatemala
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 28,619 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 1,381 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 72nd and Guatemala ranks 75th of 114 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 280,000 current US$ | 76,667 current US$ | 203,333 current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Eritrea or Guatemala?
- Eritrea, at 30,000 current US$ against 28,619 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2005.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Eritrea and Guatemala?
- 1,381 current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Guatemala?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Eritrea and Guatemala rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Eritrea ranks 72nd and Guatemala ranks 75th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.