Eritrea vs Sierra Leone: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Eritrea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 33,884 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 3,884 current US$.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 72nd and Sierra Leone ranks 69th of 114 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 45,000 current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 280,000 current US$ | 71,667 current US$ | 208,333 current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Eritrea or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 33,884 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Eritrea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 3,884 current US$, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Eritrea and Sierra Leone rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Eritrea ranks 72nd and Sierra Leone ranks 69th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.