Eswatini vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Eswatini
1,470 current US$
in 2023
Jordan
1,450 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini rank
109th
Jordan rank
110th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Eswatini
- Jordan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1,470 current US$ against 1,450 current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 20 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 109th and Jordan ranks 110th of 114 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50,907 current US$ | 146,637 current US$ | 95,730 current US$ | Jordan |
| 2020s | 78,864 current US$ | 117,386 current US$ | 38,522 current US$ | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Eswatini or Jordan?
- Eswatini, at 1,470 current US$ against 1,450 current US$ in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Eswatini and Jordan?
- 20 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Eswatini ranks 109th and Jordan ranks 110th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.