Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Eswatini
1,470 current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
3,302 current US$
in 2023
Eswatini rank
109th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
107th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197219972023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 3,302 current US$ against 1,470 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 1,832 current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 2.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Eswatini ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 107th of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 21,250 current US$ 421,250 current US$ 400,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 10,000 current US$ 1.10 million current US$ 1.09 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 25,000 current US$ 560,000 current US$ 535,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 43,000 current US$ 1.03 million current US$ 983,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 81,544 current US$ 583,224 current US$ 501,680 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 78,864 current US$ 72,744 current US$ 6,120 current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Eswatini or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 3,302 current US$ against 1,470 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1,832 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of?
35 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 107th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/tanzania/">Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,626 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.