Euro area vs Iran: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Euro area
- Iran
How they compare
Iran currently reports 350,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 340,000 current US$.
That makes Iran's figure about 35.0 times Euro area's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Euro area ahead.
Euro area ranks 44th and Iran ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Euro area averaged higher in 1 and Iran in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Euro area | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 33,333 current US$ | 23,333 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | Euro area |
| 1990s | 37,143 current US$ | 47,857 current US$ | 10,714 current US$ | Iran |
| 2000s | 18,750 current US$ | 140,000 current US$ | 121,250 current US$ | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Euro area or Iran?
- Iran, at 350,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area as of 2005.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Euro area and Iran?
- 340,000 current US$, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Iran?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2003.
- How do Euro area and Iran rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Euro area ranks 44th and Iran ranks 41st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.