Euro area vs North Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Euro area
- North Korea
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 350,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 340,000 current US$.
That makes North Korea's figure about 35.0 times Euro area's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, North Korea has been ahead every year.
Euro area ranks 44th and North Korea ranks 41st of 45 groups.
North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Euro area | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46,000 current US$ | 498,000 current US$ | 452,000 current US$ | North Korea |
| 2000s | 18,750 current US$ | 277,500 current US$ | 258,750 current US$ | North Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Euro area or North Korea?
- North Korea, at 350,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Euro area and North Korea?
- 340,000 current US$, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and North Korea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2003.
- How do Euro area and North Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Euro area ranks 44th and North Korea ranks 41st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.