Euro area vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Euro area
10,000 current US$
in 2003
New Caledonia
330,000 current US$
in 1999
Euro area rank
44th
New Caledonia rank
43rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Euro area
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 330,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 320,000 current US$.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 33.0 times Euro area's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Euro area ranks 44th and New Caledonia ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Euro area or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 330,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Euro area as of 1999.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Euro area and New Caledonia?
- 320,000 current US$, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and New Caledonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Euro area and New Caledonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Euro area ranks 44th and New Caledonia ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.