Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
4.91 million current US$
in 2022
Uruguay
760,000 current US$
in 2017
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
35th
Uruguay rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Uruguay
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M199120062022

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 4.91 million current US$ against 760,000 current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 4.15 million current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 6.5 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 45 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 233,750 current US$ 120,000 current US$ 113,750 current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 193,500 current US$ 120,000 current US$ 73,500 current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 72,500 current US$ 380,000 current US$ 307,500 current US$ Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Uruguay?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), at 4.91 million current US$ against 760,000 current US$ in Uruguay as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay?
4.15 million current US$, with Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/uruguay/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,626 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.