Gambia vs Kazakhstan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Gambia
10,000 current US$
in 2017
Kazakhstan
10,000 current US$
in 2004
Gambia rank
93rd
Kazakhstan rank
93rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Gambia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Gambia ranks 93rd and Kazakhstan ranks 93rd of 114 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42,500 current US$ | 27,500 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 31,000 current US$ | 14,000 current US$ | 17,000 current US$ | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Gambia or Kazakhstan?
- Gambia, at 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Gambia and Kazakhstan?
- 0 current US$, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Kazakhstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Gambia and Kazakhstan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Gambia ranks 93rd and Kazakhstan ranks 93rd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.