Grenada vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Grenada
93 current US$
in 2022
Jordan
1,450 current US$
in 2023
Grenada rank
113th
Jordan rank
110th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Grenada
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1,450 current US$ against 93 current US$ in Grenada, a difference of 1,357 current US$.
That makes Jordan's figure about 15.6 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 113th and Jordan ranks 110th of 114 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53,084 current US$ | 146,637 current US$ | 93,552 current US$ | Jordan |
| 2020s | 43,002 current US$ | 156,031 current US$ | 113,030 current US$ | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Grenada or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 1,450 current US$ against 93 current US$ in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Grenada and Jordan?
- 1,357 current US$, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Jordan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Grenada and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Grenada ranks 113th and Jordan ranks 110th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.