Haiti vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Haiti
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 760,000 current US$ against 707,214 current US$ in Haiti, a difference of 52,786 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Uruguay ahead.
Haiti ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 114 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,333 current US$ | 140,000 current US$ | 126,667 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 48,000 current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | 72,000 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 905,000 current US$ | 340,000 current US$ | 565,000 current US$ | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Haiti or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 760,000 current US$ against 707,214 current US$ in Haiti as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Haiti and Uruguay?
- 52,786 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2016.
- How do Haiti and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Haiti ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.