IBRD only vs Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- IBRD only
- Sudan
How they compare
IBRD only currently reports 21.09 million current US$ against 2.15 million current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 18.94 million current US$.
That makes IBRD only's figure about 9.8 times Sudan's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 21st of 45 groups.
IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.39 million current US$ | 135,556 current US$ | 11.26 million current US$ | IBRD only |
| 2000s | 24.37 million current US$ | 1.65 million current US$ | 22.72 million current US$ | IBRD only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), IBRD only or Sudan?
- IBRD only, at 21.09 million current US$ against 2.15 million current US$ in Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between IBRD only and Sudan?
- 18.94 million current US$, with IBRD only ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Sudan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.
- How do IBRD only and Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- IBRD only ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 21st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.