Iran vs North Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps
Iran
350,000 current US$
in 2005
North Korea
350,000 current US$
in 2008
Iran rank
41st
North Korea rank
41st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps over time
- Iran
- North Korea
How they compare
Iran currently reports 350,000 current US$ against 350,000 current US$ in North Korea, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1995 it was North Korea ahead.
Iran ranks 41st and North Korea ranks 41st of 114 countries.
North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56,000 current US$ | 498,000 current US$ | 442,000 current US$ | North Korea |
| 2000s | 223,333 current US$ | 420,000 current US$ | 196,667 current US$ | North Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Iran or North Korea?
- Iran, at 350,000 current US$ against 350,000 current US$ in North Korea as of 2005.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Iran and North Korea?
- 0 current US$, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and North Korea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2005.
- How do Iran and North Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Iran ranks 41st and North Korea ranks 41st of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.