Iraq vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Iraq
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 760,000 current US$ against 509,578 current US$ in Iraq, a difference of 250,422 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.5 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Uruguay ahead.
Iraq ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 114 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 70,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 110,000 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 2.64 million current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | 2.52 million current US$ | Iraq |
| 2010s | 1.02 million current US$ | 428,750 current US$ | 594,375 current US$ | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Iraq or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 760,000 current US$ against 509,578 current US$ in Iraq as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Iraq and Uruguay?
- 250,422 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uruguay?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Iraq and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Iraq ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.