Jordan vs South Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Jordan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 1,794 current US$ against 1,450 current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 344 current US$.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Jordan ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 108th of 114 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 146,637 current US$ | 127,281 current US$ | 19,356 current US$ | Jordan |
| 2020s | 117,386 current US$ | 62,381 current US$ | 55,005 current US$ | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Jordan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 1,794 current US$ against 1,450 current US$ in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Jordan and South Africa?
- 344 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Jordan ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 108th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.