North Korea vs Lebanon: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps over time
- North Korea
- Lebanon
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 350,000 current US$ against 324,423 current US$ in Lebanon, a difference of 25,577 current US$.
That makes North Korea's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1995 it was North Korea ahead.
North Korea ranks 41st and Lebanon ranks 44th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 626,667 current US$ | 56,667 current US$ | 570,000 current US$ | North Korea |
| 2000s | 320,000 current US$ | 710,000 current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), North Korea or Lebanon?
- North Korea, at 350,000 current US$ against 324,423 current US$ in Lebanon as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between North Korea and Lebanon?
- 25,577 current US$, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Lebanon?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2008.
- How do North Korea and Lebanon rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- North Korea ranks 41st and Lebanon ranks 44th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.