North Korea vs Mali: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps over time
- North Korea
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 400,000 current US$ against 350,000 current US$ in North Korea, a difference of 50,000 current US$.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times North Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1996 it was North Korea ahead.
North Korea ranks 41st and Mali ranks 39th of 114 countries.
North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 540,000 current US$ | 100,000 current US$ | 440,000 current US$ | North Korea |
| 2000s | 420,000 current US$ | 145,833 current US$ | 274,167 current US$ | North Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), North Korea or Mali?
- Mali, at 400,000 current US$ against 350,000 current US$ in North Korea as of 2005.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between North Korea and Mali?
- 50,000 current US$, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Mali?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2005.
- How do North Korea and Mali rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- North Korea ranks 41st and Mali ranks 39th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.