Kyrgyzstan vs Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 90,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 20,000 current US$.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Liberia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 59th and Liberia ranks 57th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77,500 current US$ | 75,000 current US$ | 2,500 current US$ | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 56,667 current US$ | 110,833 current US$ | 54,167 current US$ | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Kyrgyzstan or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 90,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2005.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Kyrgyzstan and Liberia?
- 20,000 current US$, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Liberia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2005.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Liberia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 59th and Liberia ranks 57th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.