Latin America & Caribbean vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)

Latin America & Caribbean
5.09 million current US$
in 2023
Zambia
516,249 current US$
in 2023
Latin America & Caribbean rank
33rd
Zambia rank
34th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Zambia
02.0M4.0M6.0M197019962023

How they compare

Latin America & Caribbean currently reports 5.09 million current US$ against 516,249 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 4.57 million current US$.

That makes Latin America & Caribbean's figure about 9.9 times Zambia's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Latin America & Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 34th of 45 groups.

Latin America & Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 485,000 current US$ 38,750 current US$ 446,250 current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
1980s 284,000 current US$ 24,000 current US$ 260,000 current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
1990s 1.08 million current US$ 147,000 current US$ 937,000 current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
2000s 3.47 million current US$ 652,000 current US$ 2.82 million current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
2010s 4.75 million current US$ 917,550 current US$ 3.83 million current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
2020s 3.85 million current US$ 760,996 current US$ 3.09 million current US$ Latin America & Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Latin America & Caribbean or Zambia?
Latin America & Caribbean, at 5.09 million current US$ against 516,249 current US$ in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Latin America & Caribbean and Zambia?
4.57 million current US$, with Latin America & Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Zambia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 34th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/latin-america-and-caribbean/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-new-zealand-current-us-gaps-filled/latin-america-and-caribbean/zambia/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
159 places, 5,626 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.