Lesotho vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Lesotho
16,776 current US$
in 2021
Malta
20,000 current US$
in 2001
Lesotho rank
86th
Malta rank
84th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Lesotho
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 16,776 current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 3,224 current US$.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 86th and Malta ranks 84th of 114 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36,000 current US$ | 29,000 current US$ | 7,000 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 50,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Lesotho or Malta?
- Malta, at 20,000 current US$ against 16,776 current US$ in Lesotho as of 2001.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Lesotho and Malta?
- 3,224 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Malta?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2001.
- How do Lesotho and Malta rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Lesotho ranks 86th and Malta ranks 84th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.