Liberia vs Malaysia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Liberia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 98,419 current US$ against 90,000 current US$ in Liberia, a difference of 8,419 current US$.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 57th and Malaysia ranks 55th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 75,000 current US$ | 120,000 current US$ | 45,000 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 110,833 current US$ | 88,333 current US$ | 22,500 current US$ | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Liberia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 98,419 current US$ against 90,000 current US$ in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Liberia and Malaysia?
- 8,419 current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Malaysia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2005.
- How do Liberia and Malaysia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Liberia ranks 57th and Malaysia ranks 55th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.