Mali vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Mali
- OECD members
How they compare
OECD members currently reports 590,000 current US$ against 400,000 current US$ in Mali, a difference of 190,000 current US$.
That makes OECD members's figure about 1.5 times Mali's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, OECD members has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 114 countries.
OECD members has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100,000 current US$ | 787,500 current US$ | 687,500 current US$ | OECD members |
| 2000s | 145,833 current US$ | 885,000 current US$ | 739,167 current US$ | OECD members |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Mali or OECD members?
- OECD members, at 590,000 current US$ against 400,000 current US$ in Mali as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Mali and OECD members?
- 190,000 current US$, with OECD members ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and OECD members?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2005.
- How do Mali and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Mali ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.