Nauru vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New … New Zealand gaps over time
- Nauru
- South Sudan
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 1.91 million current US$ against 1.69 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 219,990 current US$.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 22nd and South Sudan ranks 24th of 114 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.00 million current US$ | 1.54 million current US$ | 460,452 current US$ | Nauru |
| 2020s | 2.64 million current US$ | 1.91 million current US$ | 736,504 current US$ | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Nauru or South Sudan?
- Nauru, at 1.91 million current US$ against 1.69 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Nauru and South Sudan?
- 219,990 current US$, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Nauru ranks 22nd and South Sudan ranks 24th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.