Nepal vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) over time
- Nepal
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 330,000 current US$ against 246,835 current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 83,165 current US$.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.3 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 46th and New Caledonia ranks 43rd of 114 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 100,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | Nepal |
| 1990s | 346,000 current US$ | 239,000 current US$ | 107,000 current US$ | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$), Nepal or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 330,000 current US$ against 246,835 current US$ in Nepal as of 1999.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$) between Nepal and New Caledonia?
- 83,165 current US$, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and New Caledonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 1999.
- How do Nepal and New Caledonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, new zealand (current us$)?
- Nepal ranks 46th and New Caledonia ranks 43rd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$) with 290 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.